Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 10263] vagrant Version: 1.7.2

PMC Members,

I've asked these questions, in the CQ, before deciding if this can be classified as an "exempt pre-req".

= = = =
Is the "version" (1.7.2) a hard constraint? Or does that must mean 1.7.2 or

Also, you say "when \'vagrant\' isn\'t present, it
would be pretty useless." You mean one specific feature of "Linux tools",  
right? Not the whole package?

Also, are there any alternatives? Other OS software that in theory someone
might want to use instead? If so, I just wanted to be sure there was at least
some potential to be open or pluggable, even if in future.

I just spent 30 seconds looking, but this post caught my eye:

= = = =

I'm not sure the questions are even directly relevant, but just want to be sure
I understand big picture first.

[Roland, or others, you can answer in either CQ or here to this list. Your choice.].

From:        emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        10/13/2015 04:57 PM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] [CQ 10263] vagrant Version: 1.7.2
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
                CC|                            |sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx
          Severity|awaiting_committer          |awaiting_pmc

--- Comment #4 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2015-10-13 16:57:22 ---
Forwarding on to PMC for discussion/vote on exact dependency requirement....


Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.

Configure CQmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
tools-pmc mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top