| Re: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Dawid Paku?a |
|
OK, so we won’t expect any +1’s from you :).
Yes, lets talk next week.
Doug.
From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 at 10:42 AM To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Dawid Paku?a > BTW, I think it would be great now that we have more members that we have
> at least two approvers for the committer votes. I very much do not like the idea. What's the purpose/reason? Seems to add process, bureaucracy, and confusion for little (if any) gain. Plus, if there is a real disagreement or question, another member could still vote "-1" ... even if it was to say "wait, we need to discuss in a meeting". Remember, we are merely approving that the committers "followed the rules of Eclipse" in voting in a new committer; we ourselves are not deciding if they should be a committer or not ... that's up to the project committers ... as long as they are following the Eclipse process rules! [Note: mechanically, in Portal, I think you should just say "wait" ... I believe a literal '-1 vote' in the portal will terminate the process and the committers would have to re-nominate and re-vote in that case, which is overkill, if a PMC member just thought it needed more discussion before final decision.] I would recommend if a PMC member has some question or doubt, they could post a message saying they wanted to discuss at meeting (even if no one had voted yet). We can discuss the concept more at our meeting next week, if you'd like. > Thoughts? You did ask! :) From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 02/07/2014 09:40 AM Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Dawid Paku?a Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 BTW, I think it would be great now that we have more members that we have at least two approvers for the committer votes. Thoughts? Doug. On 2/7/2014, 9:29 AM, "portal on behalf of emo" <portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >tools PMC Members, >This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for >Dawid Paku?a's Committer status on the tools.pdt project. As a PMC member, >you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation portal >page: > > http://portal.eclipse.org/ > >Dawid Paku?a was nominated by Jacek Pospychala as follows: >Over the last few months Dawid has been contributing quality patches to >PDT >addressing issues found either by him, or discovered by community that >were >related to performance, code completion and code formatting. > >Since we started using Gerrit in Nov 2013, he solved following issues: >Bug 422338 - [performance] Regenerate DOM AST on each editor focus >Bug 425871 - The code assist on PHP core function doesn't work inside an >... >Bug 425663 - Maven problems with fresh .m2 repository Tycho version bump - >... >Bug 426063 - It's not possible to use releng tools (mvn clean verify) on >OSX >Bug 425781 - Exception while using try catch finally >Bug 425620 - Code Formatter eats array suffx code: fn()[0] becomes fn() >... > >Bug 422306 - Completion interfaces inside PHPDoc Support for @param and >@var >Bug 421784 - Default background on syntax coloring and formatter preview >... >Bug 422306 - Completion interfaces inside PHPDoc >Bug 421994 - ParserBuildParticipant not set >IBuildContext.ATTR_MODULE_DECLARA... >Bug 416807 - Class name resolution via ::class Initial php 5.5 support >... >Read offset from context >Bug 417904 - Option 1, special interface to access IProblemIdentifier in >... > > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=422338 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425871 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425663 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=426063 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425781 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425620 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=422306 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=421784 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=422306 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=421994 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=416807 > * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417904 > >Vote summary: 3/0/0 with 0 not voting > +1 Natalia Bartol > +1 Jacek Pospychala > +1 Zhao Zhongwei > > >_______________________________________________ >tools-pmc mailing list >tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc _______________________________________________ tools-pmc mailing list tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc |