Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[tools-pmc] Fwd: FW: [mtj-dev] Sequoyah termination stalled



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: [mtj-dev] [tools-pmc] Sequoyah termination stalled
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 01:10:26 +0000
From: <pranav.gothadiya@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Wayne,

Forwarding you this mail as i am not sure my reply reached to you earlier.

Please provide your comments.


Sent from my lumia 920

From: Gothadiya Pranav (Nokia-MP/Bangalore)
Sent: ‎07-‎05-‎2013 06:13 AM
To: ext Gorkem Ercan; MTJ Developer discussions
Cc: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: RE: [mtj-dev] [tools-pmc] Sequoyah termination stalled

Dear Wayne,

Thanks for the mail.

Please consider that we (Nokia) are very much interested in MTJ project keep running and it is very important for Nokia as well. We have now started investing more time on this project.  Now back on track, I assure you that I will address all  project related concerns.

I am on personal vacation at this moment. But I make sure to send you plan within 2 weeks and we will surely add more life to the project.

Please provide your comments.

Thanks for your understanding


Sent from my lumia 920

From: ext Gorkem Ercan
Sent: ‎07-‎05-‎2013 03:25 AM
To: MTJ Developer discussions
Cc: Tools PMC mailing list; Gothadiya Pranav (Nokia-MP/Bangalore)
Subject: Re: [mtj-dev] [tools-pmc] Sequoyah termination stalled

Resending since it did not reach tools PMC

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I had wanted to keep the MTJ running (when I was the project lead) because Nokia at the time had a product based on it and there was a possibility of active involvement with the project. I am no longer with Nokia and have no visibility to their plans but at least it looks like they are not very active. However I will let Pranav comment on that. 


On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:38 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm not sure what you are expecting from us, PMC, here.
As far as I can tell, MJT has too committers,
Gorkem Ercan, Pranav Gothadiya (recent project lead).

Why are they (MJT) not being terminated too? I didn't see anything in Termination Review or the bug you referenced where it was stated that they WANT to continue. Am I missing it? Or missing some history?

MJT project, if you are listening, can you explain why you want to continue? What you plan to do with the project?


From:        Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Cc:        sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:        05/03/2013 03:28 PM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] Sequoyah termination stalled
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Greetings Tools PMC.

The Sequoyah project's termination process has stalled. I'd like to kick it back into gear.

The termination review documentation is here:

The bug that I'm using to track the termination is here:

Your input is welcome.

Some things to note:

* MTJ needs to move from being a Sequoyah subproject to a Tools subproject.
* MTJ's website is still in CVS which means that it hasn't been touched in at least four months.
* MTJ feels like it's on life support. Some TLC might be in order.

Can the PMC please coordinate with the MTJ project to make sure that the impact of the move from tools.sequoyah.mtj to tools.mtj is fully understood?

I'd like to schedule this review to start next Thursday.



Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects,
The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about
Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon France 2013_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list

mtj-dev mailing list

Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon France 2013

Back to the top