Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] required discussion/agreement for "works with" classification of third party dependency

Sorry I missed that post.  This seems fine to me as a workswith.  +1


On 2010-09-08, at 11:19 AM, David M Williams wrote:

Hey Guys,

Can you please respond to my post on tools-pmc list?

It is _required_, as mentioned in the CQ
that we discuss and decide one way or another (or, I guess, the default is if there is no discussion, then there is no decision, which is the same as saying "no, they can not do it").

If that is your view or intent, then would be best for you to say so explicitly. But doesn't seem that radical or controversial to me ... so if you agree a simple +1 would suffice, I'd think. If you disagree, that's fine too, but with silence none of us know.


Back to the top