|Re: [tools-pmc] COBOL Project|
I only know what I see in the project's newsgroup.
I recommend asking the project to assemble some Termination review documentation. If you don't hear back, the EMO can help you put something together. All the better if somebody steps up and the termination review ends up being unsuccessful.
Doug Schaefer wrote:
Are they interested in consuming or contributing? Or more importantly, is there a project lead dedicated to keeping it a live. We've been fooled a couple of times and I'm not convinced activity is really "ramping up".
I still vote to hold a termination review. If a project lead steps up before the gavel falls then we can keep it.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Tools PMC.
Just following up on recent discussions regarding the COBOL project.
The project itself appears to have very little activity occuring
from within the project. However, there does seem to be some
activity ramping up around it. There is some potential that others
may step up to put some work into it.
How do you want to proceed?
tools-pmc mailing list
Back to the top