Yes, a termination review is the required next step.
Mike Milinkovich
Office: +1.613.224.9461 x228
Mobile: +1.613.220.3223
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: November-25-09 6:33 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] Cobol project archive
Fine with me,
but I think you mean "termination review", right? Not archiving
directly ... archiving is one possible outcome ... albeit probable.
From:
|
Doug
Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
|
To:
|
Tools
PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
|
11/25/2009
01:48 PM
|
Subject:
|
[tools-pmc]
Cobol project archive
|
Sent by:
|
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
Hey gang,
At the DemoCamp last night we had Jeff, John, and myself present and we have
agreed to proceed with archiving of the Cobol project. If anyone else disagrees
please speak up ASAP or we'll start the process.
Thanks,
Doug._______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc