|
And
I was about to make the exact same comment.
Committership
as far as I know is granted to an individual, in agreement with an eventual
employer.
The
simplest way to have a committer leave a project is resignation
:-)
Now
having committers that leave a company and continue to be committers is imho a
great thing, especially if you want to improve your diversity rankings
;-)
Cordially
--
Cheers
Philippe
Hear
hear.
John
beat me to it….
I want to point out
that the "Not working for Zend anymore" is not a reason to remove committer
status. Commit status stays with the developer even if they change employment.
You are allowed to remove commtters who become inactive which seems to be the
case for all the committers so you're in good shape.
Have you contacted
any of the committers to see if they still want commit access ? In the past,
when committers became inactive, they happily gave up their commit access and
this makes the process much simpler.
If any of the
pending removed committers still think they should be committers then we
should discuss those individually but for the rest if there is agreement then
send an note to the EMO to remove. Please state whether or not the committer
has agreed that they are not longer active and they are giving up commit
status.
John
| 