[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] Mylyn 2.1 did not have a Release Review
|
Rather than removing it entirely, is it also acceptable to rename it from Release (type R) to RC (type S), both in the zips and update site.xml? We've been told it's acceptable to do so in the past for EMFT components. Does that solution no longer apply?
Nick
On 10/17/07, Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mik, Eugene, Gail, Ian, Rob, Steffen, (cc/ Tools PMC)
I noticed that the
Mylyn web
page announces the 2.1 release of Mylyn as of September 27th.
However, I do not recall having a
Release
Review for 2.1 (looking at the
list
of completed reviews, I don't see it either). All
major
releases are required to go through a Release Review, where "major"
is defined as M.N. Bug fix releases (M.N.P) are exempt assuming that
there are no new features in a bug fix release. The
Mylyn N&N implies
that there are new features in 2.1, so it's not just a bug fix release,
right?
Thus, either:
- There was a 2.1 Release Review and I am forgetting it (if so,
please provide a url), or
- The 2.1 Release is really a 2.0.1 Release and thus exempt (if so,
please explain why the N&N shows new features), or
- There was no 2.1 Release Review.
In the later case, you need to remedy that error ASAP. Anne will get
you on the schedule in the absolutely next available slot. In the
meantime, you should also take the 2.1 release off the website and the
download and update site until it has had a Release Review and IP
clearance.
- Bjorn
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc