[tools-pmc] Re: [ptp-dev] PTP 1.1 review advisory vote

[Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I didn't realize this was a requirement. I've voted now. Do you also need a Tools PMC vote?

Greg

On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Anne Jacko wrote:

Hello PTP folks,

It's been a week since we had the review call for the PTP 1.1 release, and it's time to close the advisory voting--please see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=175068.

The recently revised Eclipse Development Process includes this provision (see http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Development_Process_2006_Revision_Final#Reviews for the details):

A successful advisory vote requires at least one +1 from each level of the Project's Leadership Chain.

I've checked the votes, and I didn't see a +1 vote from anyone in the project leadership chain. Until we have one, we can't count the review as being successful. I know that many of you might be here at EclipseCon this week, so I'll consider the vote to still be open until I hear from one of you that you have had a chance to cast the necessary +1 vote. Thanks!

Anne Jacko

emo@xxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________

ptp-dev mailing list

ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev