Re: [tm-dev] December committer meeting

[Xuan Chen <xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dec. 4 is fine for me too.

Regards,

Xuan Chen, Problem Determination Tools for IBM i
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx



David McKnight---21/11/2012 11:27:04 AM---Dave, that's fine by me.

David McKnight/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

21/11/2012 11:16 AM

Please respond to
TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [tm-dev] December committer meeting

Dave, that's fine by me.

____________________________________
David McKnight 
Phone: 905-413-3902 , T/L: 969-3902
Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx
Mail: D1/YFY/8200/TOR
____________________________________

David Dykstal ---21/11/2012 10:56:25 AM---It appears that my schedule for December 5 is completely blocked. This would normally be the date f

From:	David Dykstal <david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	TM project developer discussions <tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	21/11/2012 10:56 AM
Subject:	[tm-dev] December committer meeting
Sent by:	tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

It appears that my schedule for December 5 is completely blocked. This would normally be the date for our next committer meeting. Are there any objections to holding our next meeting a day earlier on Dec 4 at the same time? 

-- David Dykstal, Architect - Rational Developer for Power Systems_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev

_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev