|Re: [tinydtls-dev] State of things, bugs and conformance|
Hi Paul, and Olaf,
We did a significant refactoring of TinyDTLS for Contiki-NG as we needed to
use it in a bit of a less common use-case. I will put some words / comments
Only reason for change of affiliation is that we have had a merger of research institutes in
But I will still respond if someone “calls” out ;-) - I agree that there are other OS:es with more
traction - but some of them do lack mesh IoT stack for 802.15.4 so if that is your target I’d say
Contiki is still king ;-) If you aim at BLE - it is not the case.
If there would be any interest in taking in the refactoring we did to enable more “standalone”
usage of TinyDTLS we might be able to upstream some of it. But that would require someone
in the TinyDTLS team to discuss the ideas and turns we took.
— Joakim Eriksson, RISE / SICS / NES
Back to the top