Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval request for ACTF 1.4 (Neon)release
OK, sounds like a reasonable plan.
+1

Eric
June 8, 2016 3:26 AM
Hi Eric,

Excuse me, I missed this mail last week.

And, thank you for remind it. Honestly, we could not pay enough attention
to these two issues (and some other old issues) due to resource
limitation.

We would like to prepare our future refactoring plan of ACTF SDKs, and
then will decide how to handle these old issues to align with the plan.

In addition, I'll try to check SWT related things after we complete the
preparation of Neon release.

Many thanks,
Kentarou
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
IBM Research - Tokyo
Tel: +81-3-3808-5252
E-mail: kentarou@xxxxxxxxxx



From: Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2016/06/02 21:03
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval request for ACTF 1.4
(Neon) release
Sent by: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



The review material looks good, but I do have a question about the
internal classes and reflection use that is mentioned. I see that the 2
bugs about migrating away from that are about 7 years old, with no updates
since the original creation. What, if any, progress has been made with the
SWT team to either expose what ACTF needs or assist in writing
alternatives? Have you tried to engage SWT about these?

Eric

Kentarou Fukuda
June 1, 2016 1:45 AM
Dear Technology PMC,

Would you please review our release review document and approve ACTF 1.4
(Neon) release?

Release review document:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.4.0/review


Approved IP Log:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11466

Release track bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=494460

Many thanks,
Kentarou
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
IBM Research - Tokyo
Tel: +81-3-3808-5252
E-mail: kentarou@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
June 2, 2016 8:02 AM
The review material looks good, but I do have a question about the internal classes and reflection use that is mentioned. I see that the 2 bugs about migrating away from that are about 7 years old, with no updates since the original creation. What, if any, progress has been made with the SWT team to either expose what ACTF needs or assist in writing alternatives? Have you tried to engage SWT about these?

Eric

June 1, 2016 1:45 AM
Dear Technology PMC,

Would you please review our release review document and approve ACTF 1.4
(Neon) release?

Release review document:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.4.0/review

Approved IP Log:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11466

Release track bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=494460

Many thanks,
Kentarou
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
IBM Research - Tokyo
Tel: +81-3-3808-5252
E-mail: kentarou@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

Back to the top