|
Dirk,
If there are no internal packages, does that mean that all packages are exported from the NatTable bundle(s)? If so then this really sounds like it needs a major version increase (2.0.0) because adding to interfaces is a breaking change. Even if the interfaces aren't "supposed" to be used by clients or extenders, they could be.
I'm basing these thoughts on https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/API_Central
Other PMC members, any thoughts?
Eric
On 2015-01-19 14:35, Dirk Fauth wrote:
Hi Eric,
since we do not have "internal" packages, those changes are not backwards-compatible. This is the reason why I mention them in the New & Noteworthy.
Most of the interfaces are mainly used internally, but NatTable is treated as "open framework", so if users customized their table in that detail, they will face issues. Users that simply use NatTable with its configuration possibilities won't suffer.
Greez,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
|
