Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

[Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yepp, see http://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/March_07_2012#Any_issues.3F_Everyone_in.3F_Any_exceptions_known.3F for the protocol of the call.

Regards,
Markus

2012/3/9 Benjamin Cabé <bcabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

I don't know if you guys discussed Koneki during latest Planning Council meeting, but I assume that we're good to go?

Thanks!

Benjamin.

________________________________________________________________________

De : Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date : Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:07:43 -0800

À : "technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Much/most of the planning council has responded to my petition for Koneki to join Juno with a +1. No concerns so far. But, we need to give this another couple of days to wrap up.

Wayne

On 02/22/2012 01:12 PM, Benjamin Cabé wrote:

Thanks for the clarification Wayne.

The three new (6240, 6241, 6242) would need to be approved for Juno indeed.

Regarding the remaining four:

• 5278 is NOT needed for Juno
• 5275 and 5575 ARE needed.
• 5276 could virtually be withdrawn, since 6240 is requesting the inclusion of a newer version of the Metalua library. 5276 already passed preliminary review, though, and I have detailed in 6240 with as much detailed possible the delta between the version in 5276, and the one in 6240 that we would need for Juno.

Thanks,

Benjamin

________________________________________________________________________

De : Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:04:42 -0800
À : "technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Strictly speaking, the CQs need to be identified as being required for Juno by Feb 8. But since they're already in the system, we may have some wiggle room.

I see the three new CQs; can I assume that the remaining four currently unapproved CQs must also be approved for Juno?

Wayne

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc