| [technology-pmc] Committer election for Angelo ZERR |
|
Greetings Nebula developers. The election for Angelo has completed. Unfortunately, I can only find two bugs under Nebula [1] with contributions from Angelo and neither of them have actually been committed. In the nomination criteria, Wim states "Angelo is committed to Eclipse and he has contributed to many bug reports." Perhaps my Bugzilla-fu is weak; can you point me to some of those bug reports? Becoming a committer requires a demonstration of merit. The election criteria should describe that merit in the most specific (but concise) detail possible. Generally, it is enough to cite a handful of bugs. Or--in the case of a contribution of significant new functionality--that a new committer is being brought on to support that new functionality. As I dig into the two bug reports that I've found, I notice that they seem to be significant new functionality and that you have opened CQs for the contribution. Can we reasonably argue that this is signficant new functionality and that will be enhanced and supported by Angelo moving forward? Wayne [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?emailreporter1=1&emailcc1=1&list_id=127146&emaillongdesc1=1&classification=Technology&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&query_format=advanced&emailqa_contact1=1&email1=zerr&product=Nebula --
Wayne Beaton The Eclipse Foundation Twitter: @waynebeaton   |