Re: [technology-pmc] Prerequisites for Graduation Review for Code Recomm

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

With regard to diversity, more is always better. However, the current diversity in the project is sufficient for graduation. The "credit to Eclipse" aspect is also, IMHO, good as I seem to hear good things about the project from lots of different sources.

I'm a little concerned, however, that there doesn't seem to be a functioning build. At least, I can't find the results of one (the repositories indicated on the project's download page appears to be bogus).

It'd also be nice to see more community involvement via Bugzilla. I count 63 bugs, with only one of them including patches from a non-committer (Bug 347397). It's definitely a good start, however. FWIW, there is no record of this patch in the project's IP Log (either via marking bug attachments iplog+, or by setting the author field in Git). Let me know if you need help with this.

Aside from that, are the project's APIs stabilizing?

Wayne


On 12/08/2011 09:24 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:

Hi PMC,

we are currently working to get our builds signed, conform to the release train guidelines etc. In parallel, we are looking for interested packages that would be willing to host Code Recommenders in their package. The Java and RCP packages expressed some interest and JEE has been proposed too. To join the Java package, Steffen told me that it would be recommended to leave incubator state before.

Since leaving the incubator state is a decision of the PMC, I'd like ask you whether this would be supported by them PMC - and if conditionally - which requirements we have to satisfy except the formal/measurable criteria defined in http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2011.php#6_3_2_Graduation_Review, http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Graduation_Reviews, and http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Criteria_for_Graduating_from_Incubation_Phase_to_Mature_Phase

Especially the points regarding "active and sufficiently diverse communities" and "has credit to Eclipse" is something I cannot estimate.

Thanks for your feedback,

Marcel

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton