Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Subversive release review for Indigo
What about the following:
- The subversive repository hosted at eclipse reference an external repository that is also enabled. The referenced repository contains the GPL libraries in a p2 repo.
- The subversive repository hosted at eclipse contains one IU (maybe the subversive feature) has an optional dependency on the GPL library.

This way when the user installs the subversive feature the GPL library is automatically pulled down by virtue of the dependency, but eclipse has never hosted anything that is GPL.

On 2011-05-30, at 5:21 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:

Hi Igor. How do you define "required" in "Board allows GPL code to be required" on slide 15? Is this different from the Workswith dependency the project already has on SVNKit?

FWIW, the "Board allows GPL code to be distributed from eclipse.org" option is a non-starter.

Wayne

On 05/30/2011 02:06 PM, Igor Vinnykov wrote:

Dear Technology PMC members,

 

We've prepared docuware for Indigo Simultaneous release. Please review it and let us know if it can be submitted to EMO.

- http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/publications/Subversive-Indigo-Review-Mini.pdf

- http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/publications/Subversive-Indigo-Review.pdf

 

Best regards,

Igor Vinnykov

Subversive Team

  

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

Back to the top