|Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Ralf Sternberg
I hope I'm not being too anal or pedantic about this, but...I notice in the bug report that several of the contributors are listed as only contributing 1%. Is it necessary/prudent/appropriate to grant them committer status for such a small contribution?
I hesitate to ask (because most of the names are well-known and already committers on other projects and there is probably not any practical harm), but if we want to make our committer approval process consistent we should be open and conscious about this kind of situation.
Eric On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:10 PM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for Ralf Sternberg's Committer status on the technology.examples project. As aPMC member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation portal page: http://portal.eclipse.org/ Ralf Sternberg was nominated by Wayne Beaton as follows:Ralf is a contributor to the new Toast example contribution (Bug 289164);he requires committer access to continue this excellent work once this contribution is committed to Eclipse CVS (CQ 3536). * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=289164 Vote summary: 5/0/0 with 0 not voting +1 Wayne Beaton +1 Scott Lewis +1 Benjamin Muskalla +1 Heiko Seeberger +1 Remy Suen _______________________________________________ technology-pmc mailing list technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
Back to the top