[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [technology-pmc] Restructuring Nebula Project
|
It's the before or after question. I think a good policy would be to let projects graduate at technology and then ask them to find a permanent home. Perhaps, the "relocation plan" would be a required part of the graduation review.
Oracle
Konstantin Komissarchik | Consulting Member of Technical Staff
Phone: +1 425 201 1795 | Mobile: +1 206 898 0611
Oracle Eclipse Tooling
411 108th Ave NE, Suite 2100 | Bellevue, WA 98004
-----Original Message-----
From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gunnar Wagenknecht
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 11:15 AM
To: Technology PMC
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Restructuring Nebula Project
Konstantin Komissarchik schrieb:
> Some thought should be given to post-technology home for stable widgets, but unless it is very likely that the code would be merged into an existing project, I don't see any harm with going forward with creating separate projects. Nicely encapsulated mature projects should be easy to move from technology to another top-level project.
Didn't we define a 1.0 release as a suitable milestone for projects to
leave the technology project? Maybe I just remember incorrectly.
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/
