Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Re: Please schedule an archive review for the ALFproject 
Hi Brian,
We are happy to work with you to schedule your Archive Review. Please see this page for a detailed description of the steps in the review process: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Archive_Reviews
We already have Wayne's PMC approval for the review, so you can disregard that part. If you have any questions after reading the wiki page and referenced documentation, just let me know. Thanks. 

Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Brian Carroll wrote:


Anne, Wayne, et al,

Yes, Wednesday November 12th works fine. I will assemble the slides,
though may want to pass a draft by you prior to the review.

I looked over the sample slides (and thank you for providing the
sample), but did not see any timframes or schedule for the archiving
mentioned. My impression from earlier exchanges on this mailing list is 
that we can propose a timetable that will assure an orderly closing of
the project.  I ask because of the following:
Last week I participated in the Eclipse Higgins Face-to-Face meeting in 
Waltham, MA and presented the case for transferring the ALF SSO
components to the Higgins project. By way of background, ALF has always been working closely with Higgins, mainly as a consumer of Higgins. ALF 
has built technology that nicely complemented the STS, and in fact,
constitutes the bulk of the the code in the Eclipse ALF CVS repository. 
That contribution of code and corresponding committers from ALF to
maintain the code was well received by Higgins leadership and the F2F
participants, and I know enjoys broader support.
I would appreciate guidance on how to effect that contribution and would 
like to see the archiving schedule accommodate that.

Any advise on how to best accomplish that contribution would be
appreciated, especially where it relates to the timing of the
contribution vs the archiving process.  In this case, the code is
already in Eclipse CVS and the bulk of the IP due dilligence has been
completed.

Regards,
Brian


  Brian Carroll | Eclipse ALF Project Lead | Serena Fellow
  (O) (503) 617-2436 (C) (503) 318-2017
Serena Software - The Mashups are here!


-----Original Message-----
From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 9:47 AM
To: Anne Jacko
Cc: Technology PMC
Subject: [technology-pmc] Re: Please schedule an archive review for the 
ALFproject

Sounds good to me.
Brian, does this date work? Can you assemble some slides for the archive 
review?

There's an example here [1].

I can do it, if you'd rather.

Thanks,

Wayne
[1]http://www.eclipse.org/project-slides/Ecesis%20Archival %20Review.pdf 

Anne Jacko wrote:

Certainly. How about Wednesday, Nov. 12, at 8am PT?

Also, will you be acting as project lead for the review, or will
someone from the ALF project be doing that? Thanks.

Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx




On Oct 31, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:


Hi EMO. Can you please schedule an archive review for the ALF

project?


Thanks,

Wayne




_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
**********************************************************************

Back to the top