Sarah,
Don’t get me wrong…if there is a thriving committer
community in and around OHF, we would love to keep the project going. It is
certainly possible that we (the EMO and the Technology PMC) have misunderstood
the situation.
One related question: OHF has historically been a single project
enclosing a number of fairly disjoint project related to healthcare. As I
understand it, the IHE and HL7 components are forking over at OHT. So one
possibility is that the remaining components become their own separate
projects. But again, this is just an idea. It is the consensus of the
committers that really counts here.
From: Sarah E Knoop
[mailto:seknoop@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 1:18 PM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; Open Healthcare Framework Mailing list
Cc: 'Stefan Edlund'; grahame@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'James Kaufman'; 'Yossi
Mesika'; 'Open Healthcare Framework Mailing list'; ohf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx;
'Technology PMC'
Subject: RE: [ohf-dev] Re: [technology-pmc] Proposal for STEM to be a
project under the Technology PMC (was OHF project shutting down)
There has been
a considrable lack of communication among committers to OHF. It's time we
use this list for our discussions and minimize mis-characterizations of this
project.
Sarah Knoop
Healthcare Systems Research Manager
IBM Almaden Research Center
650 Harry Rd.
San Jose, CA 95120-6099
email: seknoop@xxxxxxxxxx
phone: (408) 927-2622 (tie 457-2622)
"Mike
Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
ohf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2008
08:11 AM
Please respond to
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
Open Healthcare Framework Mailing list <ohf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
<grahame@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"'Open Healthcare Framework Mailing list'"
<ohf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Technology PMC'"
<technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
"'Yossi
Mesika'" <MESIKA@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Stefan Edlund'"
<edlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'James Kaufman'" <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Subject
|
RE:
[ohf-dev] Re: [technology-pmc] Proposal for STEM to be a project
under the Technology PMC (was OHF project shutting
down)
|
|
> I believe that it is not true to say that the OHF project is
"shutting
> down", though it's future is certainly up in the air.
STEM wants to create its own project.
SODA wants to move to EclipseRT (Scott - you need to confirm that on this
list!)
Keeping an empty project around does not seem to make much sense to me.
_______________________________________________
ohf-dev mailing list
ohf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ohf-dev