Re: [technology-pmc] Please make Thomas Hallgren a co-project lead on B

[Anne Jacko <anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It appears to be all done--Thomas is in the database as a Project  
Lead. Thanks.

Anne Jacko
Development Process Operations
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx
503-784-3788



On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Henrik Lindberg wrote:

> Hi,
> Can you please make Thomas Hallgren a co-Project Lead on the  
> Buckminster
> technology project?
>
> Thanks
> Henrik Lindberg
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Question about project lead.
> Date: 	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:03:13 -0700
> From: 	Anne Jacko <anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: 	Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx>
> References: 	<46EEABB5.9000205@xxxxxxx>
> <45C7CA8C-EBE6-4638-BCAC-57D2BE839BEB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> <46EED8BC.5020803@xxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Yes, it's OK for you and Henrik to be co-Project Leads. I recommend
> that you send your request for PMC approval for this change to the
> Tech PMC mailing list. It will probably be Bjorn that approves it,
> but the whole Tech PMC should know about it. That list is technology-
> pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>
> Anne Jacko
> Development Process Operations
> Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 503-784-3788
>
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
> > Hi Anne,
> > Thanks for the clarification. The documentation states that "Sub-
> > Projects are managed by one or more Project Leaders". I interpret
> > this as it would be OK if both me and Henrik has that role.
> >
> > Henrik, can you please approve this?
> >
> > Is the Tech PMC several persons or is it just Bjorn?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thomas Hallgren
> >
> > Anne Jacko wrote:
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > Within the project you use whatever process makes the most sense
> > > to propose the change or addition. Some projects do a vote on
> > > their dev mailing list. Then each level of the project leadership
> > > needs to approve it. That would be Henrik as current PL, and then
> > > the Tech PMC. Then you send e-mail to EMO with some evidence that
> > > the project leadership has OK'd the change (mailing list post, e-
> > > mail trail, etc.) and then EMO indicates approval and we update
> > > the Foundation database. Does this make sense? It's documented
> > > here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/
> > > development_process.php#4_3_Management
> > >
> > > Thanks--let me know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > Anne Jacko
> > > Development Process Operations
> > > Eclipse Foundation
> > > anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 503-784-3788
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Anne,
> > > > For some reason, I'm not listed as a project manager for the
> > > > Buckminster project. Henrik Lindberg is. Most people think its me
> > > > and it's some times inconvenient that it's not. I talked to
> > > > Henrik about it and we agree that the best thing would be if we
> > > > both could be managers. If one manager is required, then it
> > > > should be me.
> > > >
> > > > What is the process required to change this?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc