Per,
These diversity answers are good answers - could you update your slide
deck to include these statements? The goal is to the have the slide
deck be a stand-alone document for the archives, thanks.
Additionally, the readers of the slide deck/document shouldn't have to
search for the 13 companies adding to EPF - you should just list them
in the slide deck itself. The goal is to have the slide deck be
readable and complete standing alone.
- a) ...
b) ...
c) These figures do not fairly reflect actual contributions. ... <I
have a separate issues to deal
with that some valuable team members should committ their work and not
work through others, but it does not mean that they do not add value or
are not involved>
d) ...
- Slide 20: "Several major organizations..." and
"Many organizations..." - I'd like to see a concrete list.
PKR: I could rapidly find 13 companies that add value to EPF.
I think
this is just the tip of an iceberg... Every time I go to a conference,
a new company tells me that they are using EPF one way or the
other...Also
note that that I do not have all companies listed that are supporters
of
EPF....
My concern with your answers above is the (c). What you're saying is
that your contributor community is larger and diverse, but that
your committer community is not. What can you do/what plans do
you have to convince those contributors to become committers?
- Bjorn
|
