Re: [technology-pmc] [Fwd: Neil Bartlett - New Committer Request Form]

[John Duimovich <John_Duimovich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ok... no problem... its just I actually
had not approved it quite yet (i had an unsent email pending) but was in
the process of doing so... you beat me to it due to your timezone advantage
in France :) 

consider it approved.

Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>

07/05/2006 11:02 AM

To	John Duimovich/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
cc	Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [technology-pmc] [Fwd: Neil Bartlett - New Committer Request Form]

John,
Could you just cc the technology-pmc@ mailing list when you do approvals
for committers and code contributions? That will help me/us avoid contradicting
you and annoying our hard-working project teams.

Mark,
Sorry about the incorrect assumption that there was no PMC approval.

John Duimovich wrote: 

Bjorn, 

He asked me for approval and I and I was replying (just this morning)  and
my (now useless unsent reply) asked him to put my name on the PMC list
as approved. I took yesterday off (take advantage of us holiday :)) so
I assumed I'd have time to answer. 
Well, uh, I'm in Europe at ECOOP and there's no holiday
here.


Your second question stands... some justification would be nice to have
for these committers. From what I understand, Neil would be working on
improving the QT port of eSWT which is something that would be good for
the project.  Neil is also a volunteer in this scope so being difficult
with rights here could be counter productive. 

Mark - do you plan to restrict him to this component ? I forget if eRCP
is divided into separable components this way. 

John