[sumo-user] Impact of junction shape on simulation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[sumo-user] Impact of junction shape on simulation

From: yu tang <herrtangvonjj@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:54:43 -0400
Delivered-to: sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/>
List-help: <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user>, <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/sumo-user>, <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi all,

I found it is hard to edit junctions in NedEdit so that the shapes match road geometry in real life, meanwhile I think it can be solved by manually defining the shapes in the corresponding xml file. 

Suppose other conditions keep unchanged and only junction shapes are refined, does it have any potential influence on simulation accuracy? Or do we have better solutions to addressing junction shapes?



Best,
Yu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sumo-user] Impact of junction shape on simulation
  - From: Jakob Erdmann

Prev by Date: Re: [sumo-user] Ego-blocking vehicles do not include ego vehicle in their "blocking" list ever
Next by Date: Re: [sumo-user] Ego-blocking vehicles do not include ego vehicle in their "blocking" list ever
Previous by thread: [sumo-user] Ego-blocking vehicles do not include ego vehicle in their "blocking" list ever
Next by thread: Re: [sumo-user] Impact of junction shape on simulation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs