[sumo-user] junction inspect with "show connections over junctions": not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[sumo-user] junction inspect with "show connections over junctions": not understood case of priority flow (with TLS)

From: "Rob Maris" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:10:05 +0100
Delivered-to: sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/>
List-help: <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user>, <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/sumo-user>, <mailto:sumo-user-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)

In all junction cases in my net with TLS (and also without), the cyan resp. white connection lines are drawn according to the "logical" prioity. In the case of the attachment, this is not the case (one screenshot in T- and one in I-mode).
I'd suggest that the edge priorities define the correct default priority connection scheme.
settings clockwise, from the north edge: 10, 9, 12, 3.

How to establish a correct representation as desired?

Attachment: Screenshot_20220203_130147.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: Screenshot_20220203_130720.png
Description: PNG image

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [sumo-user] junction inspect with "show connections over junctions": not understood case of priority flow (with TLS)
  - From: Jakob Erdmann

Prev by Date: [sumo-user] How to add overtaking in SUMO
Next by Date: Re: [sumo-user] Using TAZ as junction departed flow
Previous by thread: [sumo-user] How to add overtaking in SUMO
Next by thread: Re: [sumo-user] junction inspect with "show connections over junctions": not understood case of priority flow (with TLS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs