Re: [stp-pmc] Enterprise Component Framework creation review coming up

[David.Brandow@xxxxxxxxxx]

I'm not sure I agree.  I admit
that it does seem analagous, but that doesn't necessarily mean its overlapping.
 The reason I'm not convinced there's an overlap is that if you took
this proposal away and tried to implement the same solution using STP,
I'm not convinced you'd be able to do it.  Perhaps you could, or perhaps
we would need to broaden STP in order to allow this technology to be an
extension of STP, I haven't spent enough time thinking about it yet.  But
I don't think we should rush to judgement.

-----------------------------------------------
Keep your stick on the ice,

David Brandow
Sybase EAServer Engineering

Carl Trieloff <cctrieloff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: stp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/31/2006 09:07 AM

Please respond to
cctrieloff@xxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	STP PMC list <stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [stp-pmc] Enterprise Component Framework creation review coming up

yip, mostly overlap expect for one language and no assembly model.


Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Guys, take a look at this one and tell me what you think. I think
that
> this has a lot of overlap with what we want to do in STP, so what
do
> you think?
>
>  --oh
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ecp/
> _______________________________________________
> stp-pmc mailing list
> stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc

_______________________________________________
stp-pmc mailing list
stp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-pmc