Re: [stp-dev] Look and feel proposal for integration of XEF and WTP-base

[David Bosschaert <davidb@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Andrei,

Thanks for your response. I will look into the interfaces and will get 
back about them early next week.
I just noticed that my alternative mockup images were not properly 
showing up on the page, so I have re-uploaded the images.

Cheers,

David

Andrei Shakirin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I find your proposal very useful, but I am not quite sure what is the best solution for use case, when policy has some assertions and alternatives on the same level.
>
> I have updated wiki page (http://wiki.eclipse.org/STP/GUILookAndFeelIntegrationProposal
> ) and described possible solutions. I also have published draft variant of interfaces between editors.
>
> My suggestion - keep the first iteration as simple as possible: just implement solution to edit single alternative on the first step. Our interfaces are flexible enough and we can extend this functionality on next iterations.
>
> What is your opinion?
> How you find the interfaces suggestion?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Bosschaert" <davidb@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "STP Dev list" <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2007 13.00 Uhr (GMT+0100) Europe/Berlin
> Subject: Re: [stp-dev] Look and feel proposal for integration of XEF and WTP-based policy editors
>
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Thanks for kicking this design off. The overall proposal looks fine to me.
> I did put in a questions and took the liberty to provide an slight 
> alternative to your second screen shot. I hope this will work for you.
> I've clearly marked my comments with my name.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/STP/GUILookAndFeelIntegrationProposal
>
> Andrei Shakirin wrote:
>   
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Look and feel proposal for integration of XEF and WTP-based policy editors is available from:
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/GUILookAndFeelIntegrationProposal
> >
> > @David: could you please look and comment it? If it is OK from your point of view, we can start the next steps: design interfaces and extension points and finally define functionality and requirements.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrei. 
> > _______________________________________________
> > stp-dev mailing list
> > stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
> >
> >   
> >     
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
>
> _______________________________________________
> stp-dev mailing list
> stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
>
>   

----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland