[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [stp-dev] Ongoing STP Development Activities
|
Hi Adrian,
You mentioned that you will address the SC regarding the integration
build, but what about the Deployment Framework?
Will it be included in the integration build too?
Best regards,
Bogdan
-----Original Message-----
From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Adrian Skehill
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 7:14 PM
To: STP Dev list
Subject: [stp-dev] Ongoing STP Development Activities
Hi All,
Following on from our recent initial contribution we have now planning
to continue development in Service Creation components in a number of
areas, mainly around
* JAX WS Development and fleshing out what we have
* WSDL First Mode support
* Integration with the STP Deployment infrastructure
* Packaging & Build System Updates
JAX WS
=======
From the JAX WS Perspective, a number of bugzilla bugs have been
created:
159578 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx NEW
annotation view
needs to be made extensible to new annota...
159579 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx NEW
annotation
wizards: preferences entries are required for ...
159580 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx NEW
annotation wizards
should be optional
159591 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx NEW
JAX-WS runtime
preferences
159592 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx NEW
"runtimeProvider"
extension point can only support 1 ext ...
And two which were bugs were fixed earlier today as they were serious
enough to warrant an immediate fix
159575 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx
RESO FIXE
annotation view doesn't auto refresh properly
159577 nor P3 All david.beaurpere@xxxxxxxx RESO
FIXE annotation
view can corrupt the java document it is editing
Our aim here with the JAX WS stuff is to get it to a more usable robust
state and these bugs represent our starting point areas that we feel
would be best made. I would welcome suggestions if there's stuff you'd
like to see done (or indeed contribute) in this area.
WSDL First Mode
===============
Secondly, in terms of provision of a WSDL First Mode for the STP, I'm of
a very strong belief that we need to integrate with the WTP editor. I've
create a bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159742
to capture my initial thoughts on how to start about this integration.
I'll follow up with Oisin on this to get a conversation started.
Deployment Integration
======================
I'd like to also kick off some discussions here on the integration
points with the contributed deployment framework. We have been doing
some research here in IONA on this and will be discussing this on the
dev list soon.
Build & Packaging
=================
Currently we're not shipping either the deployment framework or the SC
code in Integration builds. I plan on updating the build system to
address the SC side of things in the next week or so. Bugzilla 159730
raised for this and I'll post to the list once it's done.
In addition to this I'm also going to start scheduling weekly builds of
the STP going so the download site will start to reflect this activity.
If you have any comments / questions on the above feel free to drop me a
line.
Regards,
Adrian Skehill.
Principal Engineer,
IONA Technologies.
_______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev
