RE: [stellation-res] Big changes - should we go for it?

["Jonathan Gossage" <jgossage@xxxxxxxx>]

The workspace content issue for the interim development was my sole
reservation. I think that Mark's suggestion will work well as an interim
solution.

Regards

Jonathan

> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>> If you're proposing to keep N separate Eclipse plugin projects
> >>> within a single
> >>> Stellation SCM project, that's probably fine (modulo a question or
> >>> two).
> >>> If you're proposing something else, please clarify.
> >>
> >> That's right - I meant to say all of the Stellation Eclipse plugins as
> >> a single Stellation project in the repository.
> >>
> >>> The proposed change will significantly impact the Stellation GUI
> >>> plugin
> >>> design:
> >>
> >> Actually, it really shouldn't. WVCM is sufficiently powerful and
> >> flexible that by using it, we can actually solve that problem
> >> gracefully!
> >
> > That's likely true for the final GUI plugin (for WVCM).
> > However, I was referring to the T-Client plugin, designed to work with
> > the existing Stellation client/server/repository code.
> >
> > My assumption was that the proposed change was w.r.t. the **current**
> > ongoing
> > work, to _create_ the WVCM implementation.  We're using the existing
> > Stellation
> > codebase for that work, so I figured I'd need to change the T-Client
> > in order to
> > support our near-term WVCM effort.
> >
> > Am I missing something?  If not, it still seems that I will need to
> > enhance the
> > T-Client design in order to accommodate the near-term consolidation of
> > multiple
> > pre-WVCM Stellation projects into a single pre-WVCM Stellation project
> > comprising multiple Eclipse projects.
>
> Sorry; I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about the non-interim
> GUI.
>
> For the interim GUI, I would just say let the Stellation workspace be
> the same thing as the Eclipse workspace. I wouldn't bother with trying
> to
> support both single-project and multi-project modes in the interim
> client - the interim client should be just enough for us to use to
> develop the
> real WVCM client.
>
> 	-Mark
>