[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [stellation-res] New repository API checked in
|
At worst though you might have to fully qualify our names or the Eclipse
names in an environment where they conflicted. We don't want the names to
get too long or we will compromise readability in the normal case.
Regards
Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Wright - IBM Research" <jwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [stellation-res] New repository API checked in
> At 01:38 PM 10/22/2003, Mark C. Chu-Carroll wrote:
>
> >OK, in my local copy, I've changed the conflicting names. Instead of just
> >adding
> >"Stell" to the names, I tried to expand the names to make them more
> >informative
> >when there was a good choice. Here's what I would up with:
> >
> >- IPath -> IResourcePath
> >- IResource -> IResourceVersion
> >- IProject -> IStellProject
> >
> >
> >I'll check this in with the next version.
>
> Thanks. It's good to make the names more meaningful.
> I'm still a bit nervous about IResourceAnything; Eclipse has a lot of
> IResourceXXX
> interfaces, and may well add more in future.
>
> - Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> stellation-res mailing list
> stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res
