| Re: [stellation-res] Proposal to rename 'getProperty' to 'get property', 'SetProperty' to 'set property' |
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 13:47, Dave Shields wrote: > I propose to replace the current getProperty and setProperty commands with 'get property' > and 'set property', respectively: > > -- All command names would (once again) be words that are transitive verbs > > -- No command would contain any upper-case characters > > -- This would allow for extending get and set in the future by adding new subcommands, > and not new top-level commands. > > If approved, I would put this in right away, as I would like to stabilize the workspace API soon. I'm not crazy about it... Actually, I think that I'd prefer to have the commands be "get" and "set", rather than a subcommand. I think that anything about an artifact that you get and set is a property of that artifact. -Mark -- Mark Craig Chu-Carroll, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center *** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration *** http://www.eclipse.org/stellation *** Work Email: mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Personal Email: markcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part