RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?

From: "David Shields" <shieldsd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:07:03 -0400
Delivered-to: stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/stellation-res/>
List-help: <mailto:stellation-res-request@dev.eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res>, <mailto:stellation-res-request@dev.eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res>, <mailto:stellation-res-request@dev.eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Based on the comments to date, which indicate no strong sentiment one way
or the other, I suggest we try some literal naming, starting with command
names, and possibly option-related stuff as well. Jonathan, care to have a
go? Since this won't affect API, I can put in changes as they come in.

working on javadoc,
dave

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?
  - From: Jonathan Gossage
- RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?
  - From: Jonathan Gossage

Prev by Date: [stellation-res] latest CVS does not compute^Wcompile
Next by Date: RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?
Previous by thread: RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?
Next by thread: RE: [stellation-res] To what extent should literals be named?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs