Re: [stellation-res] Comparing abstractions

["Mark C. Chu-Carroll" <mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 15 August 2002 08:34 pm, Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 16:59, Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:
>
>     On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 10:04, Mark C. Chu-Carroll wrote:
>
>         I did a bit of cleanup on Rodolpho's submission, and wrote a very
>         quick prototype of the template mechanism. They're checked in to
> the latest version of core under repos/database. For comparative purposes,
> here's a single table implemented in each:
>
>     Just checked out your version and found that you did a good job with
>     the code I wrote at midnight. Can I hire you for my team?
>
>
> One more thing: your version does not add the NOT NULL constraint to
> fields that form the primary key. I stored the names of those fields in
> a vector just to check when the constraints were needed.

Yeah, I know... I was trying to do a quick cleanup of the code in order
to create a side-by-side comparison. If we decide to go the abstraction
route, I'll extend things so that the Fields can handle things like that.

	-Mark

-- 
Mark Craig Chu-Carroll,  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center  
*** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
***		http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
*** Work Email: mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  ------- Personal Email: markcc@xxxxxxxxxxx