| Hi y’all, 
 
 I have been playing with the new jakartaEE archetype 1.0.0 and have a few ideas / questions / findings I would like to discuss with you. 
 
 Ideas / Questions 
 Is it a good idea to create one archetype per git repo?
 The reasoning behind this is that you can easily create a new archetype when needed. For every example an archetype?  Every repo separately maintainable and version-able. A Gui to choose from the different archetypes and examples. Right now the archetype supports multiple application servers and that makes it more difficult to maintain IMHO. 
 The current archetype has a database in the demo code, but that database is not application server managed. does that not defeat the purpose of a Jakarta project with a database.
 
Normally when run in an application server I am used to a JTA managed datasource where the application server is responsible for the actual connection. Maybe that makes the example misleading or confusing for users. 
 
 The archetype should have a README.md file with basic information about the how and what of the archetype.and example run scripts.A License file?
 
 
 So that are some of the things I was thinking about when trying out the archetype :-) Please let me know what you think. 
 Have a nice weekend. 
 Ivo. 
 @ivonet 
 
 
 
 |