|Re: [spatial4j-dev] Spatial4j 0.7 in December?|
I can definitely do an update of jeo with the new JTS dependency asap. No problem there. That said, I’d also be fine with dropping jeo as a dependency and just porting whatever classes we might be using for tests directly into spatial4j. To be honest I haven’t been doing any active development on jeo for quite some time (having kids has reduced by time for open source endeavours ;) ) and I don’t really have any plans to in the near term. It would be one less moving part and honestly I’d rather put that time into spatial4j anyways. Another option would be to see if there is any interest for those utility classes directly in JTS itself.
Whichever way we decide to go is fine with me and I can help with whatever option we choose.
On November 21, 2017 at 3:19:05 PM, David Smiley (david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Back to the top