[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [spaces-dev] 3.3, 3.4, or both?
|
I think we should at least tag the current implementation to at least
make it possible to branch at some later date if wanted.
Do we need to have two update sites if we simply want to freeze the
current release for 3.3 ?
Henrik Lindberg
henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5 apr 2008, at 11.11, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
It will become increasingly hard to maintain one single code-base
that will be compatible with both Eclipse 3.3.x and Eclipse 3.4.x.
That begs the question, do we want to be backward compatible with
Eclipse 3.3 or do we consider Spaces to be a new project that has
its first proper release when Ganymede is released in June?
Staying backward compatible will cause some overhead since we'll
need a separate branch and a separate update site.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
spaces-dev mailing list
spaces-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/spaces-dev
