Thanks,
Bob. That comes timely. I was going to send a similar
request.
Suggestions:
·
We need an application
domain for our sample scenario. Ideas? Financial systems?
Logistics? Retail? Something fancier?
·
You and I start
exchanging sample BPMN models for that domain.
·
Model should contain
steps being supposed to invoke Web Services. Need WSDL.
·
Marc D. to prepare
exposing this Web Service.
·
Anything Andrian can add
on a DL falvour?
Marc
From: Bob Brodt [mailto:bbrodt@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 19:58
To: SOA PMC mailing list
Cc: Adrian Mos; Marc Dutoo; Gille, Marc
Subject: Re: [soa-pmc] submission to ECON?
Hi all,
I just wanted to catch up with everyone and get a
(somewhat) early start on preparing for the SOA Symposium.
I'm sure at some point we'll need to get serious and make
sure we're all reading from the same script, but I just
wanted to toss around some ideas sooner rather than later.
Anyone have any suggestions or ideas?
Cheers!
Bob
Hi
guys
I guess we all got the news already, but just to say it,
the Eclipse Con program is out and the SOA Symposium is
in, so we're getting a little bit closer to the "beer
part" ;)
Regards,
Marc
http://eclipsecon.org/2013/program/session-schedule/tutorials
Le 13/12/2012 08:53, Marc.Gille@xxxxxxxxxxx
a écrit :
Bob,
find attached my slide deck I used at
EclipseCon Europe 2012. One of the biggest issues there
was, that our presentations were not really connected.
This is what we intend to address in Boston.
Regarding Stardust:
·
If you
have build issues, please post them in the forum. We may
help.
·
Stardust’s
Eclipse Modeler creates indeed XPDL (and the engine
consumes it), but this modeler is on sunset – we may
want to use yours as indicated on the Stardust HP. We
are focusing on our Browser Modeler (also part of the
Stardust code base and called Lightdust) which is
working on BPMN and XPDL. For BPMN we are using the
Eclipse BPMN2 Metamodel underneath as I think you do.
Hence, this should work smoothly (although I agree that
we should test at the earliest). We will be using the
Browser Modeler in Boston. We can exchange sample models
to check compatibility immediately.
Happy to hop on a conf call any time next
week.
Marc
Hi Marc,
Not sure if this has been asked before, but was the
EclipseCon Europe presentation recorded, or is there a
slide deck available? I would be interested in seeing
the "show" in its entirety.
I've started looking seriously at Stardust and am
currently running into some build issues, but hope to
have those resolved soon. What worries me, though, is
that the Process Model editor appears to only handle
XPDL. It was my understanding that BPMN2 was supported
also - am I missing something?
When you have some spare time, maybe we could do a
conference call and discuss the eclipsecon 2013
presentation. I'd like to get started on preparing
something sooner rather than later...just in case ;)
Cheers!
Bob
Great. Thanks, Bob. May be
alternatively to “open the process model
alternatively with the BPMN2 modeler”, we should
open subsequently with both editors to show that
both may modified and be used by their respective
audiences without breaking things. Should not be a
biggy as we both work on the same metamodel
implementation. An nothing is wrong with a little
regression test …
Marc
OK, done. Thanks Marc &
Marc :)
Bob,
just added you to the submission.
I suggest you insert a line saying that, in
parallel to modeling the process in Stardust
modeler in Orion, you can benefit of the BPMN2
standard to view and edit it in Eclipse thanks
to the BPMN2 editor...
Regards,
Marc
Le 19/11/2012 20:32, Bob Brodt a écrit :
OK, that sounds good to me
(especially the "beers" part - I can certainly
handle that ;)
Can you list me as one of the speakers for the
current SOA-Track session and just let me know
about how much presentation time I'll have? Is
this something we can work out later (maybe in
tomorrow's PMC call?)
So, I don't
think I'll be able to put something together
for the editor by today's deadline, but I
could certainly ride your coattails if
you'll let me ;)
[marc.gille]
Coattail right away.
I'll have
much more free time over the Christmas
holidays to devote to a presentation - what
kind of integration/tutorial were you
thinking about Marc?
[marc.gille]
Most importantly all tools to be used in
an integrated fashion. At least your
modeler and Stardust (and its Browser
Modeler) should work seamlessly as we
are both using BPMN2 metamodel.
Some
Web Service + UI Mashup, deploy, run,
beers.
That
was my thinking.
Cheers!
Bob
Gents,
this is what I have
submitted:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/soa-track
Happy to adjust (or you do).
Bob, any chance that you could join the
mix?
Marc
Great, so we need to
make a submission, deadline is today :).
Can somebody (Marc or Marc) do this, and
put us three as authors? I'm traveling
and don't have a laptop...
Adrian.
Sent from my iPhone.
Hi Adrian, Marc
The other Marc (I) is also interested,
as I said in my email replying to
Marc's "Attendees SOA Track" email.
I'd submit updates to my ECE talks,
with new stuff & demos since
EasySOA will have ended by then.
Regards,
Marc
Le 16/11/2012 18:16, Mos, Adrian a
écrit :
Hi Marc,
So far it seems we
are the only ones interested in
proposing a session. It would be great
if you could put a submission in, you
can add me as a co-author. I suggest
keeping it simple for now, basically
just saying that following our
successful SOA Symposium in ECON EU,
we are planning to provide a more
focused tutorial, focused on practical
demos, to keep the momentum going.
There are many things happening in
this space and we can certainly show
interesting things in Boston. One idea
is to also have a talk accepted, like
the Modelling Symposium, with
lightning talks from various projects:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/modelling-symposium
I will be away
from Sunday for a week but I can keep
in touch by email.
Cheers,
Adrian.
I
also think we should. But I cannot
work on anything before tomorrow
afternoon. Happy to draft sth after.
Marc
Hi Guys,
the submission
deadline to ECON 2013 is Monday. Are
we going to propose a follow-up
session to our SOA Symposium? I think
we should… What are your thoughts?
Adrian.
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
|