[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: R: [soa-iwg] IWG media launch on April 22
|
Scott,
perhaps it seems to be a bit nitpicking, but Composent, Inc. is not a member of the IWG, but you as an individial commiter. Therefore I would disapprove off adding dismiss to add Composent, Inc..
Zsolt
Am 14.04.2010 um 23:05 schrieb Scott Lewis:
> Ian,
>
> In existing draft, it says this as a bullet item:
>
> *
>
> REST and SOAP support for remote services, based on the OSGi 4.2
> remote services specification.
>
> I suggest that this be broken into two bullet items:
>
> 1) Support for the OSGi 4.2 remote services specification
> 2) REST and SOAP support for OSGi remote services
>
> Before the ECF contribution, the SOA package did not have support for
> the OSGi 4.2 remote services specification, and that is major
> technology/interoperability addition by itself. The REST and SOAP
> support for remote services extends things significantly...in the
> direction of REST-based and SOAP-based remote services. I think it
> would be better not to conflate these two things (i.e. standards-based
> support remote services in general, and specific implementation
> styles/approaches for remote services).
>
> Also...you can add Composent, Inc. to the list of participating
> companies. If you want a quote from me then I can provide one.
>
> Scott
>
>
> Ian Skerrett wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. Attached is a draft version of a proposed
>> release. Please let me know your comments.
>>
>> I would like to get quotes from each participating company. I did a
>> sample quote for Engineering based on some of their input and would be
>> happy to work with the other participants.
>>
>> Marc, I did not include your suggestions since you weren't sure if it
>> was okay to talk about them. If people think it makes sense I can add
>> something.
>>
>> The goal is to announce this next week at the SOA Day in Germany.
>> This really doesn't give much time. Will it be possible to get
>> quotes and feedback before the end of this week?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/2010 2:55 AM, majori wrote:
>>> Hi Ian,
>>> I just wanted to just wanted to add to the mail of Marc that Engineering
>>> Group participates also with two new project (accepted)
>>> -eBAM (extended Business Activity Monitoring) project that aims to realize a
>>> monitoring platform supporting the performance and management analysis of
>>> external systems. The goal of eBAM is to provide both build-time and runtime
>>> tools for a BAM platform. eBAM start from SpagoBI know how, The only
>>> entirely Open Source Business Intelligence suite.
>>>
>>> -eBPM, (extended Business Process Management) based on contribution of the
>>> OW2 project Spagic (free/open source platform for the governance of
>>> middleware services and the development of SOA applications). eBPM aims at
>>> the realization of a complete BPM solution for OSGi. The project will also
>>> provide UI and runtime support, to be able to deploy and manage OSGi
>>> services, in a declarative way, leveraging the capabilities of OSGi
>>> declarative services.
>>>
>>> With SpagoBI and Spagic, Enginnering group has develop many project in
>>> different areas: government, finance, industry, healthcare.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>>> Da: soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Per
>>> conto di Marc Dutoo
>>> Inviato: martedì 13 aprile 2010 18.03
>>> A: SOA Industry Working Group
>>> Oggetto: Re: [soa-iwg] IWG media launch on April 22
>>>
>>> Hi Ian
>>>
>>> As fare as I know (though I'm not a member of the IWG) :
>>>
>>> About JWT :
>>> * Open Wide has a JWT reference (integrated in the OW2 Scarbo SCA BPM
>>> platform) in production since February, but maybe our client will find it a
>>> bit too early to talk about it
>>> * among mailing list participants, Mastek Ltd has built a product on top
>>> of JWT, I can ask them about it (I planned to anyway)
>>>
>>> Engineering has an STP IM reference, as said in the Mangrove article (Kudos
>>> to Adrian BTW).
>>>
>>> What about Obeo and the SCA Editor ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Going further, it would be a good idea to gather all these references in a
>>> dedicated part of the website(s). What do you think ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marc
>>>
>>> Ian Skerrett a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Zsolt,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for posting these. I think these are a good start, see
>>>> comments below, but I think we need to have some technology oriented
>>>> features. What is new/exciting/different that will result from the
>>>> IWG? Why is the IWG different from other SOA solutions?
>>>>
>>>> On 4/13/2010 9:50 AM, Zsolt Beothy-Elo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here are SOPERAS findings of the of the top 5 new/exciting things
>>>>> that will be accomplished by the IWG:
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> The foundation of the new IWG shows the strong interest of the
>>>>> industry in the further server-side development of Eclipse
>>>>> technologies
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> The foundation of the IWG is also a strong signal that SOA
>>>>> technologies and projects within Eclipse have reached a good
>>>>> level of maturity. Because of this, the industry now is
>>>>> interested in using Eclipse technologies in own products
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Do we have examples of companies using the IWG technology for their
>>>> products. I am assuming Sopera has a product available, can we
>>>> reference it. Are there other companies/products?
>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> Through the foundation of the Eclipse SOA IWG, the goal of the
>>>>> creation of a fully functional, common SOA platform on the
>>>>> basis of Eclipse will be reached much faster
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>> The interoperability between the platforms of the IWG members
>>>>> will be further strengthened
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Can you explain this more or give examples of interoperability?
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> soa-iwg mailing list
>>>> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> soa-iwg mailing list
>>> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> soa-iwg mailing list
>>> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ian Skerrett
>> Director of Marketing
>> Eclipse Foundation
>> Tel: 613-224-9461 ext 227
>> Blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com <http://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/>
>> Twitter: IanSkerrett <http://twitter.com/IanSkerrett>
>> Plan to attend EclipseCon 2010 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/2010/>,
>> March 22-25
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> soa-iwg mailing list
>> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> soa-iwg mailing list
> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
