RE: AW: Fwd: [soa-iwg] ECF remote services

["Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

After parsing through a bunch of venomous bile, I believe the key question
remaining is:

Is the ECF support for SOAP-based remote service providers, as described in
[1], sufficient for inclusion in the SOA-IWG package.

[1] -
http://eclipseecf.blogspot.com/2010/01/soap-rest-and-ecf-remote-services.htm
l

Swordfish tooling can/could be used, to create those providers and thus
actually be used to implement OSGi 4.2 remote services-compliant clients.

 - Don


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lewis [mailto:slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: March 24, 2010 5:18 PM
To: SOA Industry Working Group
Cc: Donald Smith
Subject: Re: AW: Fwd: [soa-iwg] ECF remote services

SOA working group and steering committee:

We/ECF need a definite response on the question of including the ECF 
OSGi 4.2 remote services implementation in the SOA package.  Since 
components of ECF are depended upon by Equinox/platform, we have to 
freeze parts of our API soon, as well as do Helios releng planning 
around building/distributing the ECF remote services bundles.

I request that a decision be made by the steering commitee and public 
response be posted to this mailing list before April 1, 2010.  Kindly 
also post an explanation for the decision one way or another.

Scott

Oliver Wolf wrote:
> Certainly, yes. I'll send it today.
>
> Oliver
>
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: RE: Fwd: [soa-iwg] ECF remote services
> Datum: 9. März 2010
> Uhrzeit: 10:11:18
>
>
> Would it still be possible though to have the request drafted and
discussed
> in advance?
>
>  - Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:soa-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stephane Drapeau
> Sent: March 9, 2010 2:09 AM
> To: SOA Industry Working Group
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [soa-iwg] ECF remote services
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Ricco is on vacation this week. So, at best, the steering committee can
> discuss this point next week.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephane Drapeau
> Obeo
>
> Scott Lewis a écrit :
>   
>> In the Mar 3 meeting notes was this entry:
>>
>> Oliver will draft a request to the IWG Steering Committee to include
>> the suggested complimentary ECF components in the IWG package.  It is
>> known that there will not be an integration between ECF and Swordfish
>> in the short or mid term, and hence the IWG Steering Committee needs
>> to determine if this situation warrants an exception the charter which
>> has a stated goal of providing integrated components.
>>
>> My question:  When should we expect that the IWG Steering Committee to
>> have a decision about this?
>>
>> Since is a project that is depended upon by the platform, our own API
>> freeze for Helios is coming up rapidly...and if we're going to do
>> releng and perhaps even API work in support of the EPP package it will
>> have to be done soon...so we therefore need to know soon...i.e. before
>> EclipseCon....so we can schedule and complete the associated releng work.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> soa-iwg mailing list
>> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> soa-iwg mailing list
> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> soa-iwg mailing list
> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
> _______________________________________________
> soa-iwg mailing list
> soa-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-iwg
>