Hi,
thanks a lot for the quick response.
I also need the prioritization in another scenario: High throughput bulk processing vs low latency processing of a few documents.
Consider the following:
1. bulk processing of a large image database
2. Processing of a single image (uploaded from a mobile device)
Would it be a solution to use synchronous pipelines for 2? Or would the separate worker be a solution here as well?
Best wishes
Björn
Von: smila-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Schumacher
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. August 2012 17:03
An: smila-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [smila-user] Priorities in Job Processing in SMILA
Am 17.08.2012 16:29, schrieb Bjoern Decker:
Dear SMILAs,
is there a possibility to give priorities to job runs in asynchronous workflows?
For example, I have two workflows, one indexing web pages and one doing video transcoding. I would like to give the web page workflow a higher priority.
Best wishes and Thanks in advance
No, not really.
If the two jobs are using different workers, you can play around with the scale-up settings and set lower limits for the workers used in the workers of the transcoding job so that there is more space for the workers in the web crawler workflow. But if they use the same workers, that will not help.
A real job priority control would certainly be a nice thing to have (:
Jürgen.
