[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [smila-dev] Solr - indexing fields are configured twice
|
Hi Peter,
ok, that sounds like a good idea.
BTW, can you already estimate when you'll find time to do that Solr 4.0 integration?
(just a rough estimate to get an idea if that could be done for the next release)
Cheers,
Andreas
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Peter Wissel
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2012 17:05
> An: Smila project developer mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [smila-dev] Solr - indexing fields are configured twice
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> the idea of the CoreFields sequence was to create a mapping. So record
> attributes or attachments don't have to use the same name than Solr index
> fields defined in schema.xml. Also you're able to tell SMILA to look for an
> attribute or attachment in record while creating the SolrDocument to index.
> Nevertheless I like the idea of using SolrAdministration.getFieldNames() as a
> default. I'll keep it in mind for Solr 4.0 integration.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: smila-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:smila-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andreas Weber
> Sent: Freitag, 30. November 2012 15:09
> To: Smila project developer mailing list
> Subject: [smila-dev] Solr - indexing fields are configured twice
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I just wondered if there is any reason that we configure the Solr index fields
> twice:
> 1. in solr configuration's schema.xml
> 2. in the configuration of the SolrIndexPipelet (see AddPipeline.bpel)
>
> Wouldn't it be better to configure that in the schema.xml and read the
> configured fields in the SolrIndexPipelet via SolrManager /
> SolrAdministration.getFieldNames() ?
>
> And if so, does it make sense to leave the "CoreFields" parameter in the
> Pipelet and use the schema.xml fields only as a default if parameter isn't set?
> (Maybe because you don't want to index values for all configured fields, but
> this seems to be a very theoretic use case...)
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smila-dev mailing list
> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
> _______________________________________________
> smila-dev mailing list
> smila-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/smila-dev
