| Re: [simopenpass-dev] PMC Approval required for Committer Election for David Weiß on Eclipse sim@openPASS |
Yes, you are right regarding your assumption that I have created the commits containing David’s contributions. This is what I tried to say with my last message, linking to these commits. I expected the work on the project code provided by David would be sufficient to justify the acceptance as a committer. If this is not the case, David will demonstrate his participation on the development process on the next possible occasions. Reinhard Von: wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Im Auftrag von EMO EMO I'm confused. You're listed as the author and committer on all of these commits, not David. What, specifically, is the nature of David's contribution in these examples? e.g., did David write the code and give it to you to commit? Do you have any examples that demonstrate that David understands the Eclipse Foundation Development Process? I'm looking for examples of direct engagement with the process. If David is to join the team as a committer, we have to have some confidence that he understands the development process and his obligations under the Eclipse IP Policy. Wayne On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:25 AM Biegel, Reinhard <reinhard.biegel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- The Eclipse Management Organization |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature