| Re: [science-pmc] Inactive/dormant project cleanup |
Resending with Erwin's correct email address.
I'm thinking we should make Triquetrum dormant as well. I've cc'd Erwin and Christoph for their input.
I have no opinion about the other projects.
_Christopher
On 9/20/21 2:17 PM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:
Could we get confirmation from the projects before we start voting? I'm reluctant to throw a +1 in if we haven't reached out to them recently.
Jay
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 5:13 PM Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________Greetings Eclipse Science PMC.
/cc Eclipse DawnSci, Scanning, and RichBeans committers
I hope that you are all well.
Based on the assertion that "These projects can be considered dormant from the perspective of Eclipse Foundation" and the apparent lack of any activity for at least four years, the EMO believes that Eclipse DawnSci, Eclipse Scanning, and Eclipse RichBeans should all be terminated and archived.
With your approval, PMC, the EMO will initiate the termination process.
Can I get a +1?
Everybody, please take note that any forks of this content must not use Eclipse Foundation trademarks. Specifically, the "org.eclipse" namespace must be changed. Further, I believe (but will confirm) that the "DawnSci" name is a trademark of the Eclipse Foundation.
Wayne--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc
_______________________________________________ science-pmc mailing list science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc