[science-iwg] [Interest] New “open” licenses aren’t so open « Wikimedia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[science-iwg] [Interest] New “open” licenses aren’t so open « Wikimedia blog

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 05:31:39 -0400
Delivered-to: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I thought that some here might find this topic of interest. It appears that the publishing industry continues to fight against truly open science. 

https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/

‎

Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [science-iwg] [Interest] New “open” licenses aren’t so open « Wikimedia blog
  - From: Jay Jay Billings

Prev by Date: [science-iwg] Today's the deadline for Open Academy
Next by Date: Re: [science-iwg] [Interest] New “open” licenses aren’t so open « Wikimedia blog
Previous by thread: [science-iwg] Today's the deadline for Open Academy
Next by thread: Re: [science-iwg] [Interest] New “open” licenses aren’t so open « Wikimedia blog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top