Dear all,
First of all many thanks for all the work done on defining the SWG.
Unfortunately I am not able to participate much at this stage, my
apologies.
But I would like to support the proposition from Philip about
adding a topic for control systems.
One of the use cases we've seen of scientific workflows is to
combine control & data acquisition actions with (limited)
near-real-time data analysis, to enable automated feedback loops
during a (semi-)automated execution of an experiment. (cfr e.g.
http://www.esrf.eu/UsersAndScience/Publications/Highlights/2012/et/et2)
So extending the scope from mainly data analysis to also include
control-related software would certainly be relevant, especially
for environments like synchrotrons.
Thanks again and regards,
Erwin.
(
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/passerelle/)
Philip Wenig schreef op 10/04/2014 07:51:
I've added just one more issue to the scope:
10.
Control systems for analytical hardware
DESY initiated a project called CSS to control their beamline
liquid nitrogen supply:
http://controlsystemstudio.org
Another hardware related project is the Frankencamera:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/fcam/
http://techcrunch.com/2009/09/04/stanford-frankencamera-project-aims-to-create-an-open-source-imaging-platform/
Am 10.04.2014 04:04, schrieb Andrew
Ross:
OK everyone. Ready for another
round of feedback. Please comment in the Google doc or here on
the list.
Just in case we missed anyone's previous feedback or
suggestions, deep apologies & assurances it was
unintentional. Please just let us know.
A reminder to please provide all feedback by end of day
Thursday so we can make any adjustments needed and announce it
on Friday. Of course additional feedback is welcome during the
30 day review period too!
Thanks so much to the many people that contributed.
Andrew
On 09/04/14 19:45, Andrew Ross wrote:
Jay, Greg
Great work and thank you.
I'm going to do one more pass on the red text & we're
open for any final comments or feedback.
Andrew
On 09/04/14 18:07, Jay Jay Billings wrote:
Greg,
Looks great to me!
Jay
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Philip Wenig
http://www.openchrom.net
https://www.xing.com/profile/Philip_Wenig
http://de.linkedin.com/pub/philip-wenig/2a/4a8/877
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg