Re: [rt-pmc] [ECF] API breaking change in service release 3.6.1 for REST

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 from me, but I am making the assumption that you have a migration guide or similar where developers can go to find out about incompatibilities.

Tom



Markus Alexander Kuppe ---05/24/2013 11:12:44 AM---On 05/24/2013 06:01 PM, Thomas Watson wrote: > Looking at the commit for this [1] it does appear tha

From: Markus Alexander Kuppe <rt-pmc_eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 05/24/2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] [ECF] API breaking change in service release 3.6.1 for REST based remote services
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On 05/24/2013 06:01 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
> Looking at the commit for this [1] it does appear that the bundle in
> question got semantically versioned correctly.  Both the package and the
> bundle version got a major version bump.  All ECF is doing here is not
> bumping their marketing version of the project.  I don't think we have
> rules that the marketing version must adhere to semantic versioning.
>  From ECF's perspective this is a minor release of the overall project
> and they want that to be reflected in their marketing version of the
> project.
> 
> I would +1 this once Markus has confirmed my understanding.

Exactly, we want to avoid the marketing version bump (and going
through a separate release just for a single change).

Thanks
Markus


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc