Re: [rt-pmc] ECF 3.6.0 release review

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 from me

Tom



Scott Lewis ---02/26/2013 11:55:55 PM---Thanks Glyn for the quick response. I'm not sure of current protocol...do I need more than one PMC a

From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 02/26/2013 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] ECF 3.6.0 release review
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Thanks Glyn for the quick response.

I'm not sure of current protocol...do I need more than one PMC approval 
to have the EF consider it 'pmc approved'?

Thanks,

Scott

On 2/26/2013 3:57 AM, Glyn Normington wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Glyn
>
> On 26 Feb 2013, at 02:00, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> ECF would like to have a 3.6.0 release on March 11, 2013, and we've created review slides in prep for the EF review here [1].
>>
>> RT PMC approval for the review and release would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanksinadvance,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> [1] http://www.eclipse.org/ecf/reviews/ECF_Project_3.6.0_Release_Review.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rt-pmc mailing list
>> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc