| That's fine with me.
Jeff
On 2010-05-25, at 1:52 PM, Douglas Clarke wrote:
Thinking more about it... If there is any minimum number of +1 required
we should avoid voting for our own projects. I believe we have enough members of
this PMC to cover getting 3 +1 votes exclusive of voting for our own
projects.
Doug
I
thought release review slides was just one +1. My mistake
Doug
Good point Doug.
This is a case where we vote not unilaterally approve. I believe
that all PMC members should be allowed (encouraged) to vote. As with any
vote at Eclipse, it will pass if there are substantial +1s and no -1s.
Here I suspect that 3 +1s (the norm) should work. That ensures
that even if both co-leads of a project vote +1 there is still at least one
other PMC member. Seems reasonable?
Jeff
On 2010-05-25, at 1:17 PM, Douglas Clarke wrote:
Tom (Equinox project co-lead) submits slides ...
Jeff (Equinox co-lead) gives PMC +1
I thought we were not supposed to +1 our own
stuff?
Doug
+1 for the
Equinox slides
Jeff
On 2010-05-25, at 12:27 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
It is that time of year again.
Attached is a draft of the
Equinox release review slides for the Helios release (due Friday, May
28th).The RT projects participating in the Helios release need to
prepare the release review slideware and get it approved by the
RT-PMC. Please review and give your +1s.
Tom
(See
attached file: Equinox Project 3.6Release Review.ppt)(See
attached file: Equinox Project 3.6Release
Review.pdf)
rt-pmc
mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
|
