Re: [rt-pmc] Branding out bundle providers

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Pascal. Probably should use the simple name (i.e. Equinox, eRCP etc). No need for "the" or "project".

Tom



Mark Rogalski---01/24/2009 11:14:27 AM---Agree. I would use "Eclipse.org - eRCP" and http://eclipse.org/ercp

From:	Mark Rogalski/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To:	Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	01/24/2009 11:14 AM
Subject:	Re: [rt-pmc] Branding out bundle providers

---

Agree. I would use "Eclipse.org - eRCP" and http://eclipse.org/ercp is our home page.

Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/23/2009 09:56 PM

Please respond to
Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [rt-pmc] Branding out bundle providers

I don't like the "the", what about 
Eclipse.org - Equinox
Eclipse.org - Equinox project

For example it would be interesting if the user could type in http://eclipse.org/<segment> and go to a landing page

Thomas Watson ---01/23/2009 05:13:41 PM---Please see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252813 The Bundle-Vendor header specifies t

From:	Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	01/23/2009 05:13 PM
Subject:	[rt-pmc] Branding out bundle providers

---

Please see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252813

The Bundle-Vendor header specifies the provider of the bundle. This is used in the about dialog to indicate the provider of a bundle. In the past most bundles in Eclipse simply used Eclipse.org for both bundles and feature providers. The planning council has decided that Eclipse.org is too general and the project name where the bundles are developed should be included in the provider name when participating in Galileo.

So my question to you is what should the provider name be for all the bundles/features in RT. I don't think we should use the top level Runtime project as the provider of the bundles. For example, I think the bundles in Equinox should use something like 
Eclipse.org - the Equinox project

What are your thoughts on this? How are other RT leads handling this must do for Galileo?

Tom
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc